No building regulations approval? What's the solution?

Blog Post
No building regulations approval - picture of dog

When a property is up for sale and building work has been carried out on it, the seller will need a form of certification to say that the works have been inspected and that they comply with the building regulations.

At least, that seems to be the current view of many engaged in the conveyancing of properties.

Is building regulations approval really needed?

There are a number of snags with this:

  • Some works don’t need building regulations approval
  • Some could have been done before the regulations changed to include them
  • Others may have been carried out prior to the early 90s, before Certificates of Completion were introduced

Therefore, some works might not have needed approval, some did need approval but have no certificate and, in the worst case, they did need approval but no-one has applied for it!

In all these cases, there will be no documentation to show that the project is compliant with the building regulations.

Routes to building regulations approval

From the 11th November 1985 onwards, there have been two routes to gaining building regulations approval for building work. 

1. Through the local authority.

2. Through a private company, approved by the Secretary of State to carry out such work and issue approvals. Such companies are known as “Approved Inspectors”.

There are differences in the documentation issued, dependent on which route you take.

The key documents are those that are issued to state that the building works have been approved, inspected and passed. Where the work has been undertaken with the council's approval, the document is a “Building Regulations Certificate of Completion” and if an Approved Inspector is used, the document is a “Building Regulations Final Certificate”.

What happens if there is no approval, when there should be?

If building regulations approval and certification should have been obtained for building works and no such approval exists, there are potential consequences. Under the provisions of Section 36(6), Building Act 1984, the council can seek a High Court injunction to require the alteration or removal of work that doesn't comply.

Such an action can be expensive for a buyer. To add to the expense, the costs of either remedying the building or removing the offending work can be high.

Therefore, some have considered it wise to purchase indemnity insurance to cover such costs, should they arise.

The purchase of an insurance indemnity policy may cover the issue for one sale, but it doesn't remove the problem with the property.

What about the next time the property is sold?

The same situation exists, the same delays may occur, the same threat of action by the local authority remains, no progress has been made, the vicious circle continues.

Is this in the best interests of the home owner?

The way forward? Regularisation.

The clear way to break the vicious circle is to obtain regularisation certificate - this is the process by which a retrospective building regulations application can be made.

There are, however, some drawbacks with this:

1. The regularisation process cannot be used for work that was carried out prior to the 11th November 1985.

2. The process is a double-edged sword as what might have been thought to have been a simple lack of paperwork may turn out to be much more complex and expensive to rectify. When the remedial work is not undertaken, a Certificate of Regularisation will not be issued.

Some other issues to take into consideration are that building regulations regularisation can only be obtained from the relevant local authority as private sector Approved Inspectors aren't authorised to undertake this work. Further, the council will charge for the service they provide, and the charge will be higher than the one they would have raised at the time the application should have been made. (This is done deliberately as an incentive to applicants to make submissions in a timely manner.)

Nevertheless, only by making a regularisation application can the applicant find out definitively what is non-compliant with their building works.

How does this affect the sale of your property?

Knowing that approval can be given retrospectively might be enough for a buyer to take on the property. Then again it might not.

Whichever, it will be the owner’s responsibility to undertake the works to achieve building regulations compliance and it's important to know that this can be made a requirement before your sale can go through.

Completion certificates for work done before 2013

Update 20 November 2020. We've had many queries on work done years previously as you can see from the comments below. Here's some further information for those in that position:

Prior to 2013 there was no requirement for local authorities to issue completion certificates in all cases. Some authorities adopted a procedure to issue completions before this date, but not all, and the earlier the date the less likely it is that completion certificates would be available.  Consequently it may not be possible to provide a completion certificate for work carried out  before 2013.  Although there are provisions within the regulations for a local authority to accept applications to regularise work carried out without approval, there is no obligation on a local authority to accept such application. Also  the greater the length of time since work was completed, the less likely this would provide a satisfactory solution.

Conveyancing solicitors have increasingly demanded completion certificates, which was part of the reason for their introduction into regulation in 2013, unfortunately their demands do not take account when building work was completed. Provision of some form of indemnity policy is often promoted as an alternative, however this is usually only to cover legal action by the local authority for contravention of building regulations. A surveyors report indicating the current status of the property in relation to building regulations applicable at the time the work was carried out may be more beneficial to future occupiers.

Homeowner?

Read more on Front Door

 

More on this topic

Further information on home improvements can be found on LABC's Front Door website.

Every care was taken to ensure the information was correct at the time of publication. Any written guidance provided does not replace the user’s professional judgement. It is the responsibility of the dutyholder or person carrying out the work to ensure compliance with relevant building regulations or applicable technical standards.


This article was updated on 21 March 2022

Comments

Loft floor

Submitted 4 years 8 months ago

Timber and Purlin Loft with a hatch for access. Full Plans Application submitted to the Local Authority for dormer with ensuite. The plan has expired. No work was started due to the budget however I did have a timber construction built on the party wall for sound insulation. The plan states 15 joists sized 7 x 2 at 400c/c throughout and various beam sizes, dormer, roof lights, ensuite and a staircase. The room floor space is 9m x 6m and has a central loadbearing wall, and there are no obstructions of any kind. Roof lights have been upgraded by following the plan.

I am now wanting a straight forward roof light conversion and am lead to believe that the load will be lighter, therefore, we gave consent for a highly recommended joiner to deviate from the originally submitted plan to form the following raised floor by leaving the original joist in situ:
8 x 2 joists (x15) Wall to Wall, no beams were added. He needed to avoid the spars so the joists are all centred differently.

Please can you advise if the floor is built to UK Building Standards? We plan to have stairs fitted to current building standards if it does. If it doesn't then we will keep it as a storage room with a hatch for access. Either way, we fear inviting LA Building Control to inspect in case they enforce us to complete it to the plan as a habitable room or dismantle it if it can't be classed as a glorified storage room. I will struggle with the inspection fee which includes an extra slap on the hand fee. I feel stuck in a loop.

Thank you for your time.


Reply

Submitted 4 years 8 months ago

Hello there - thanks for your comment.

It appears from your description that you have contravened Building Regulations by not giving notice of intention to carry out building work. The description of work executed appears to deviate considerably from that shown on any deposited plan which you describe as expired. It isn't possible to determine if the work itself meets requirements of building regulations without a site inspection.

It has to be recommended that you engage the services of a professional advisor able to act on your behalf to resolve the issues. Your local authority may be able to deal with the work in retrospect but they are required by law to charge a fee for the service provided.

Regards,
Barry - LABC

Need approval for 5yrs building

Submitted 4 years 7 months ago

I built a house 5yrs ago. Now I started to construct on 1st floor. There is no approval for my whole building. I need a solution for this issue.

Bedrooms or not

Submitted 4 years 7 months ago

Our 5 bed 1900's stone built semi-detached has bedrooms on the second floor. We bought our property 17 years ago, the previous owner use the second floor rooms as bedrooms as did we. As far as we know they have always been bedroom. Solicitors for a potential purchaser are asking for building regs. The council won't inspect because the rooms are not an addition or a conversion and say they don't need a certificate. Situation a stand-off. Council say the rooms doesn't need and wont issue a certificate..solicitors say can't move forward without one! Help!

Reply

Submitted 4 years 7 months ago

Hello there - thanks for leaving your comment

Properties of this era often had bedrooms on the second floor so I don't understand the reason a solicitor would query this. Unless there have been alterations to form bedrooms in a part of the building not previously used for this purpose.

Kind regards,
Barry - LABC

In reply to by julie.mcnamee

Second floor bedrooms #2

Submitted 3 years 9 months ago

I have a different issue with second floor bedrooms. We bought a property with second floor bedrooms and bathrooms that look like they had been there for a long time (c1960-70?). We redecorated a bathroom on that floor last year which did not require any building regs sign off. We are doing work to the first floor and a ceiling was down when the building control inspector came to check some of the first floor work. He saw the original beams of the second floor (which he was not there to inspect) and thinks they are bowing and need to be reinforced. Can he require us to do this please?

Building Regulations

Submitted 4 years 7 months ago

Hi there
We brought this flat on a 999 year lease in 2017 ‘ we’ve now sold it ‘ but the buyers solicitor/ which happens to be the same practice as ours ‘ as found out that there was no building Regulations signed off!
Indemnity insurance was advised ‘ but before anything was decided ‘ My Solicitor instructed ME to make an application for retrospective building Regulations from the Local Council ‘ I’ve now employed someone to help get through this problem, but it’s taking forever.
I’ve now been told I should have not made the application to the Council ! But I was only following my solicitors instructions in this matter.
I’d appreciate any help in this matter ‘ as I’m totally confused now.
Many thanks
John

Reply

Submitted 4 years 7 months ago

Hello - thanks for leaving your comment.

You don't say whether the flat was formed by conversion or if it was a new build, but the main criteria would be the date of completion of any work carried out. I assume this was prior to 2017, and therefore outside any time limits for building regulation purposes.

Assuming the building work was notified to a building control body and was inspected while being built, I would recommend asking the building control body to carry out a final inspection and issue a completion certificate if possible. If this isn't possible then the two options suggested by your solicitor are the only available routes we could recommend.

Kind regards,
Barry - LABC

Certificate after Completion

Submitted 4 years 6 months ago

Hi,
In 2007 we bought a basement flat in a Glasgow tenement building and did a lot of work to to improve it, including installing a new damp proof course. One of the things we also did was to move the kitchen units from the existing kitchen at the back of the property to create a large open-plan kitchen / dining / living room at the front of the building and thereby also creating a third bedroom. We recently put the flat on the market but it came to light that we should have applied for a building warrant at the time (of which we were unaware because we didn't do any structural work such as moving walls etc). All of our changes meet current regulations with the sole exception that the extractor fan above the hob now requires to be extracted to the atmosphere. As this would necessitate 10 metres of ducting and several bends, we have been advised by extraction companies that there is no fan that would adequately meet these requirements. Do we have any alternatives? I don't suppose that there is any possible exemption when so many years have elapsed after the work was done or where, physically, because of the layout and restrictions in tenement buildings, the recommended regulation cannot be met? Or would a fan sited in the window at the front be sufficient (although it is 6 metres away from the hob and the existing fan)? Thanks. Any advice would be appreciated.

Reply

Submitted 4 years 6 months ago

Hello there

Many thanks for leaving your comment. We're the membership organisation for England, Wales and some Northern Ireland local authority building control teams. You'll find information on Scottish building control at https://www.labss.org/ although speaking directly to your local building control team might be the better option for you for this one.

Kind regards
Julie, LABC

Add new comment

This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Sign up to the building bulletin newsletter

Over 48,000 construction professionals have already signed up for the LABC Building Bulletin.



Join them and receive useful tips, practical technical information and industry news by email once every 6 weeks.



Subscribe to the Building Bulletin