No building regulations approval? What's the solution?

Blog Post
No building regulations approval - picture of dog

When a property is up for sale and building work has been carried out on it, the seller will need a form of certification to say that the works have been inspected and that they comply with the building regulations.

At least, that seems to be the current view of many engaged in the conveyancing of properties.

Is building regulations approval really needed?

There are a number of snags with this:

  • Some works don’t need building regulations approval
  • Some could have been done before the regulations changed to include them
  • Others may have been carried out prior to the early 90s, before Certificates of Completion were introduced

Therefore, some works might not have needed approval, some did need approval but have no certificate and, in the worst case, they did need approval but no-one has applied for it!

In all these cases, there will be no documentation to show that the project is compliant with the building regulations.

Routes to building regulations approval

From the 11th November 1985 onwards, there have been two routes to gaining building regulations approval for building work. 

1. Through the local authority.

2. Through a private company, approved by the Secretary of State to carry out such work and issue approvals. Such companies are known as “Approved Inspectors”.

There are differences in the documentation issued, dependent on which route you take.

The key documents are those that are issued to state that the building works have been approved, inspected and passed. Where the work has been undertaken with the council's approval, the document is a “Building Regulations Certificate of Completion” and if an Approved Inspector is used, the document is a “Building Regulations Final Certificate”.

What happens if there is no approval, when there should be?

If building regulations approval and certification should have been obtained for building works and no such approval exists, there are potential consequences. Under the provisions of Section 36(6), Building Act 1984, the council can seek a High Court injunction to require the alteration or removal of work that doesn't comply.

Such an action can be expensive for a buyer. To add to the expense, the costs of either remedying the building or removing the offending work can be high.

Therefore, some have considered it wise to purchase indemnity insurance to cover such costs, should they arise.

The purchase of an insurance indemnity policy may cover the issue for one sale, but it doesn't remove the problem with the property.

What about the next time the property is sold?

The same situation exists, the same delays may occur, the same threat of action by the local authority remains, no progress has been made, the vicious circle continues.

Is this in the best interests of the home owner?

The way forward? Regularisation.

The clear way to break the vicious circle is to obtain regularisation certificate - this is the process by which a retrospective building regulations application can be made.

There are, however, some drawbacks with this:

1. The regularisation process cannot be used for work that was carried out prior to the 11th November 1985.

2. The process is a double-edged sword as what might have been thought to have been a simple lack of paperwork may turn out to be much more complex and expensive to rectify. When the remedial work is not undertaken, a Certificate of Regularisation will not be issued.

Some other issues to take into consideration are that building regulations regularisation can only be obtained from the relevant local authority as private sector Approved Inspectors aren't authorised to undertake this work. Further, the council will charge for the service they provide, and the charge will be higher than the one they would have raised at the time the application should have been made. (This is done deliberately as an incentive to applicants to make submissions in a timely manner.)

Nevertheless, only by making a regularisation application can the applicant find out definitively what is non-compliant with their building works.

How does this affect the sale of your property?

Knowing that approval can be given retrospectively might be enough for a buyer to take on the property. Then again it might not.

Whichever, it will be the owner’s responsibility to undertake the works to achieve building regulations compliance and it's important to know that this can be made a requirement before your sale can go through.

Completion certificates for work done before 2013

Update 20 November 2020. We've had many queries on work done years previously as you can see from the comments below. Here's some further information for those in that position:

Prior to 2013 there was no requirement for local authorities to issue completion certificates in all cases. Some authorities adopted a procedure to issue completions before this date, but not all, and the earlier the date the less likely it is that completion certificates would be available.  Consequently it may not be possible to provide a completion certificate for work carried out  before 2013.  Although there are provisions within the regulations for a local authority to accept applications to regularise work carried out without approval, there is no obligation on a local authority to accept such application. Also  the greater the length of time since work was completed, the less likely this would provide a satisfactory solution.

Conveyancing solicitors have increasingly demanded completion certificates, which was part of the reason for their introduction into regulation in 2013, unfortunately their demands do not take account when building work was completed. Provision of some form of indemnity policy is often promoted as an alternative, however this is usually only to cover legal action by the local authority for contravention of building regulations. A surveyors report indicating the current status of the property in relation to building regulations applicable at the time the work was carried out may be more beneficial to future occupiers.

Homeowner?

Read more on Front Door

 

More on this topic

Further information on home improvements can be found on LABC's Front Door website.

Every care was taken to ensure the information was correct at the time of publication. Any written guidance provided does not replace the user’s professional judgement. It is the responsibility of the dutyholder or person carrying out the work to ensure compliance with relevant building regulations or applicable technical standards.


This article was updated on 21 March 2022

Comments

Flats above shop no building regulations

Submitted 4 years 3 months ago

I inherited a building from my husband who died 4 years ago. He bought it at auction and it was a shop with 7 self contained studios above (no building regs ) it’s a 1920s high street building and so I’m guessing those 7 were done years ago. Anyhow he refurbished the building and created an extra studio. No building regs. I recently had a FRA done and it complied eg alarm system, fire doors, strips, locks etc but I’m very anxious after reading around that the separation etc may not comply. I’m in a bit of a state about this as this building is my livelihood and if it was closed down etc it would be catastrophic. The studios are small so any internal lobbies would make them unviable. If I contact the LA building regs department would they just close it down and make me rip out the 8 flats and out floors, ceilings, walls etc in or is there a way they would work with me to minimise disruption. What would I do with the tenants? Atm they can’t be evicted because of Covid. I lie awake every night worrying.

Open plan living

Submitted 4 years 3 months ago

Hi we up graded an existing through lounge 9 years ago and removed the hallway we had the steel inspected by a structural engineer it was all sorted to standard the council checked it told us to board it and plaster it which we did with fire check board the kitchen is a separate room boarded off with fire board we have French doors to the upstairs bedroom as a fire escape and and all the other windows are openers there is a fire door to the left which was there when we moved in we have put up linked fire alarms but they have said we have to replace the wall to the hallway or Put in a sprinkler system after 9 years I'll health is why its took so long and this isn't making it any better can they enforce this after all this time I need it signed off to moved

Reply

Submitted 4 years 3 months ago

Hello there

It isn't clear why you are being asked to carry out remedial work. These issues often occur when a property is put on the market and a request is made by the purchaser regarding relevant approvals.

If the local authority have been asked to regularise work carried out without notification, they can't approve something just because it has been in existence for a period of time and this may be the reason for requesting the works described. I can only advise that you enter into meaningful discussion with the authority concerned.

Kind regards
Barry, LABC

Renovations inside the house without Building Regulations

Submitted 4 years 3 months ago

Hi,
We are planning to purchase a property recently we discovered that internal load bearing wall has been removed to open up the kitchen space also house went under massive renovation 4 years ago like below
1. New Electrical wiring
2. Bath Room with new bath tub and sink
3. Kitchen renovated with new cabinets, sink moved to different place with new cooker and hood
4. all the walls plastered and skimming done
5. Boiler moved to loft area
6. Windows replaced with double glazing
all the above works done by seller him self without taking any permission or consents from LA, And seller may take indemnity insurance to cover enforcement but could you please advice what difficulties I will face If I want to sell this property in future, I am in confused state I like the property structural survey didn't mention any remedial works need to be carried out. after purchase If I want to apply for retrospective regulation is one application will cover all the above or need separate application

Loft Converstion

Submitted 4 years 3 months ago

We had a loft conversion done about 10 years ago. We never received a completion certificate because there was a disagreement as whether we were classed as a 3 or 2 storey home. We never pursued this any further and heard nothing more from the local authority, However we would now like to move and its not clear how we go forward with this. We have an electrical certificate for the works and we had 3 visits form the building control officer who was happy with everything except for the fire escape. It was because of the design of the house being at various levels he could only opt for the 3 storey regulations to which we argued that we were only 2 storey. Can anyone advise us on what to do next?

Reply

Submitted 4 years 2 months ago

Hello there

You are advised to liaise with the building control team at your local authority to resolve this matter. You can find their direct contact details in the postcode search at the top of this page.

Kind regards
Julie, LABC

No building control for partial wall removal

Submitted 4 years 2 months ago

I am currently in the process of buying an end terraced Victorian house. The current owner has knocked a Large serving hatch in the wall between the kitchen and living room. He originally said no building work had been undertaken. When questioned further, he said the hatch does not constitute building work that required building control. My solicitor has told him it does and he offered an indemnity. As this does not cover the work being correct I have said I want it to be regulated by building control or I am walking away. He has refused. Am I being unreasonable and should I accept the indemnity? The work was done 2 years ago and it’s a load bearing wall.

Reply

Submitted 4 years 2 months ago

Hello there - thanks for leaving your comment.

You are quite right that the indemnity is only against any enforcement action likely to be taken by the authority. It does not mean that the work has been done in compliance with the building regulations. The current owner can make a regularisation application to building control and it may be necessary to expose the steelwork to determine adequacy including padstones and fire protection provided. Hopefully the seller will realise that the lack of approval will jeopardise any potential sale and take the appropriate action. Alternatively you could discuss this with your solicitor to see if the anticipated cost of any remedial work can be taken from the sale price.

Kind regards
David, LABC

Building regulations approval

Submitted 4 years 2 months ago

I am in the processing of purchasing a 4.5 bedroom house that had a large two story extension built in 1989. The surveyor has stated this is built well and no issues identified besides the door from room to garage not being a fire door (which I would replace). HOWEVER:

1. There is full planning permission for the extension showing on the councils website but no building control sign off. The website says historical documents may be in a separate microfiche file, which my solicitor will apply for.

2. The back wall of the extension is built approx 1 metre away from a sewer. There are two man holes on the property and the vendor states there are no issues with the drains. I will be carrying out a CCTV survey of the drains. All the neighbours also have conservatory’s / extensions to the rear of the homes too.

What are your views. Should I consider purchasing this home?

If I do where do I stand legally in terms of the building regs / sewers? I can get indemnity insurance

Would I have problems selling. Could I advertise as 4.5 bedrooms and 3 reception rooms or would I have to advertise as 3 bedrooms and two reception rooms (as per before extension)?

I really like the house and it’s all looking good after 30 years. however afraid of opening up a can of worms if I go down regularisation route. Advice appreciated!

Reply

Submitted 4 years 2 months ago

Hello there

While your surveyor has stated the extension is “well built” – the fact there appears to be no permissions in place relating to building regulations, is a real cause for concern. You should certainly seek clarification either from the vendor or the Council (although the Council may be restricted in the details they can provide you).

With regards the sewer, do you know if this defined as a “sewer” and would therefore have required the owner to formally consent with the local sewerage undertaker (the water company providing the sewerage service in your area), in order to obtain a building over agreement? Or is it just a private drain, only serving this property? You should contact the local sewerage undertaker to check this. It would be wise to have the drains checked for defects, since faults can be costly to rectify and may also lead to damage to the property.

With regards neighbouring properties having conservatories and extensions over the drain (this suggests it is a sewer if it serves more than one property), it is unlikely consultations would have taken place for the conservatories, since these are likely to be classed as exempt, however all controllable extensions should have gone through the consultation process with the sewerage undertaker. If you are in a position to do so, it might be worth querying this with one of the neighbours.

You have to make the decision, when you have all relevant information to hand, on whether to proceed with the house purchase, however if it is the case the extension does not have building regulation approval (either through the local authority or a private sector provider) – you should certainly be very cautious, despite how nice it appears.

If the extension was built in 1989, it is highly unlikely that any enforcement would be taken by the local authority and for that reason I do not think indemnity insurance serves any useful purpose.

Would you have problems selling it? A good surveyor/solicitor will always query the legal status of any works undertaken, during the conveyancing process, so yes, you are likely to been in exactly the same situation the current vendor finds themselves.

Submitting a regularisation is the only option to resolve the situation. It would involve the opening up of works, in order to ascertain compliance. Perhaps this is something the current owner would be willing to do prior to the sale going through? Or you may even decide to do this following your purchase, providing the sale price reflects the risks you are taking on.

Purchasing a property is likely to be the biggest financial decision you take– so please give careful consideration to all relevant factors prior to making your decision.

I hope you find this advice useful.

Kind regards
Richard, LABC

Add new comment

This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Sign up to the building bulletin newsletter

Over 48,000 construction professionals have already signed up for the LABC Building Bulletin.



Join them and receive useful tips, practical technical information and industry news by email once every 6 weeks.



Subscribe to the Building Bulletin