No building regulations approval? What's the solution?

Blog Post
No building regulations approval - picture of dog

When a property is up for sale and building work has been carried out on it, the seller will need a form of certification to say that the works have been inspected and that they comply with the building regulations.

At least, that seems to be the current view of many engaged in the conveyancing of properties.

Is building regulations approval really needed?

There are a number of snags with this:

  • Some works don’t need building regulations approval
  • Some could have been done before the regulations changed to include them
  • Others may have been carried out prior to the early 90s, before Certificates of Completion were introduced

Therefore, some works might not have needed approval, some did need approval but have no certificate and, in the worst case, they did need approval but no-one has applied for it!

In all these cases, there will be no documentation to show that the project is compliant with the building regulations.

Routes to building regulations approval

From the 11th November 1985 onwards, there have been two routes to gaining building regulations approval for building work. 

1. Through the local authority.

2. Through a private company, approved by the Secretary of State to carry out such work and issue approvals. Such companies are known as “Approved Inspectors”.

There are differences in the documentation issued, dependent on which route you take.

The key documents are those that are issued to state that the building works have been approved, inspected and passed. Where the work has been undertaken with the council's approval, the document is a “Building Regulations Certificate of Completion” and if an Approved Inspector is used, the document is a “Building Regulations Final Certificate”.

What happens if there is no approval, when there should be?

If building regulations approval and certification should have been obtained for building works and no such approval exists, there are potential consequences. Under the provisions of Section 36(6), Building Act 1984, the council can seek a High Court injunction to require the alteration or removal of work that doesn't comply.

Such an action can be expensive for a buyer. To add to the expense, the costs of either remedying the building or removing the offending work can be high.

Therefore, some have considered it wise to purchase indemnity insurance to cover such costs, should they arise.

The purchase of an insurance indemnity policy may cover the issue for one sale, but it doesn't remove the problem with the property.

What about the next time the property is sold?

The same situation exists, the same delays may occur, the same threat of action by the local authority remains, no progress has been made, the vicious circle continues.

Is this in the best interests of the home owner?

The way forward? Regularisation.

The clear way to break the vicious circle is to obtain regularisation certificate - this is the process by which a retrospective building regulations application can be made.

There are, however, some drawbacks with this:

1. The regularisation process cannot be used for work that was carried out prior to the 11th November 1985.

2. The process is a double-edged sword as what might have been thought to have been a simple lack of paperwork may turn out to be much more complex and expensive to rectify. When the remedial work is not undertaken, a Certificate of Regularisation will not be issued.

Some other issues to take into consideration are that building regulations regularisation can only be obtained from the relevant local authority as private sector Approved Inspectors aren't authorised to undertake this work. Further, the council will charge for the service they provide, and the charge will be higher than the one they would have raised at the time the application should have been made. (This is done deliberately as an incentive to applicants to make submissions in a timely manner.)

Nevertheless, only by making a regularisation application can the applicant find out definitively what is non-compliant with their building works.

How does this affect the sale of your property?

Knowing that approval can be given retrospectively might be enough for a buyer to take on the property. Then again it might not.

Whichever, it will be the owner’s responsibility to undertake the works to achieve building regulations compliance and it's important to know that this can be made a requirement before your sale can go through.

Completion certificates for work done before 2013

Update 20 November 2020. We've had many queries on work done years previously as you can see from the comments below. Here's some further information for those in that position:

Prior to 2013 there was no requirement for local authorities to issue completion certificates in all cases. Some authorities adopted a procedure to issue completions before this date, but not all, and the earlier the date the less likely it is that completion certificates would be available.  Consequently it may not be possible to provide a completion certificate for work carried out  before 2013.  Although there are provisions within the regulations for a local authority to accept applications to regularise work carried out without approval, there is no obligation on a local authority to accept such application. Also  the greater the length of time since work was completed, the less likely this would provide a satisfactory solution.

Conveyancing solicitors have increasingly demanded completion certificates, which was part of the reason for their introduction into regulation in 2013, unfortunately their demands do not take account when building work was completed. Provision of some form of indemnity policy is often promoted as an alternative, however this is usually only to cover legal action by the local authority for contravention of building regulations. A surveyors report indicating the current status of the property in relation to building regulations applicable at the time the work was carried out may be more beneficial to future occupiers.

Homeowner?

Read more on Front Door

 

More on this topic

Further information on home improvements can be found on LABC's Front Door website.

Every care was taken to ensure the information was correct at the time of publication. Any written guidance provided does not replace the user’s professional judgement. It is the responsibility of the dutyholder or person carrying out the work to ensure compliance with relevant building regulations or applicable technical standards.


This article was updated on 21 March 2022

Comments

Reply: purchase of house with multi-fuel stove fitted by owner

Submitted 5 years 1 month ago

Hi, many thanks for your comment.

To find out if the multi-fuel stove is compliant it would be best to seek advice from the local building control team. You can find them here: https://www.labc.co.uk/your-local-council-building-control-department — simply enter the postcode of the property and click 'Search'.

Regards,

LABC

Victorian Cellar

Submitted 5 years 1 month ago

I am selling a flat that has had a cellar turned from storage to habitable space. Its had a full damp course, heating, lighting etc. It was built in 1865 and shows the original cellar area, in the 1970's the building was turned into 4 flats. Planning permission wasn't needed to change it, however there are no building regulations still available to view. If it didn't need planning, did it still need building regs? whats the solution? the buyers solicitors is insisting seeing the building regulation consent to change into habitable space??

Reply to: Victorian Cellar

Submitted 5 years 1 month ago

Hi there, thanks for your question.

As the work was done pre-October 1985 no building regs approval is required at this time regardless of the situation back when the work was carried out. Regularisations are only possible for works carried out after that date.

Regards,

Cathal, LABC

building regulations

Submitted 5 years 1 month ago

we have lived in our house for over 20 years, as part there is a large bedroom above the second floor, we believe the roof construction over the area to be 1920, other houses (next door , three doors down, in fact 3 are clearly visible, another has a roof garden, no bedroom, no roof at all) a surveyor engaged by a proposed purchaser is demanding 'building regulation approval' for this bedroom, we feel this cannot be correct, as there were no building regulations when built, the main house was built in 1833, he demands a 'certificate' other than just laugh, how do we proceed? the local authority is not very co-operative, since they point out they had no control whatsoever

Reply to: building regulations

Submitted 5 years 1 month ago

Hi, thanks for letting us know about your situation.

If the work was done pre-October 1985 no building regs approval is required at this time regardless of the situation back when the work was carried out. As we mentioned in the article, regularisations (retrospective building regulations applications) are only possible for works carried out after that date.

Regards,

LABC

Garage internal converstion

Submitted 5 years 1 month ago

Hello

2 years ago we had the garage plasterboarded and plastered, floor risen by 4cm with damp prof membrane and corkboards, insulation and lamate flooring on top of that

All services gas/elecy in there allready as meters in there elecy sockets and light in there allready as was small gas rad.

We swooed out garage door for french doors the same height and width as garage door.

Garage is attatched to house by small utility to its side and flooring in here same height as garage room, and the main house is step up.

We were informed at time as we had done as stated that plastering walls laying lamante flooring is excempt from building regs.

We had not realised needed certifacte for french doors.

We now been forced to go for a regularastion certifacte against it despite not actually doing anything illagal. As our buyers solicter/morgage lender saying it needs certifaction and indepency policy is not allowed.

Flabbergastered that plastering and laying lamante flooring supposly needs building regs despite been told it did not origanly by the LA. We know door needed certiafaction as obviously in 2019 they make doors that are not complaint to regs. Oh wait they dont make anything not complaint double glazed do they.

Are they right 10 days before completion to ask for this.

Reply to: Garage internal conversion

Submitted 5 years 1 month ago

Hi there, thanks for letting us know about your situation.

It would be best for you to speak to your local authority building control team about whether a regularisation is needed. You can find them by entering the postcode of your property in the 'find your council' bar at the top of our website.

Regards,

LABC

No building reg approval for removal of chimney breast

Submitted 5 years ago

Hi, we bought a house in 2013 and we are now trying to sell. Our prospective buyers have raised the question of building regs. I checked with Building Control and there aren't any. Building Control have visited are are unable to provide regularisation unless the beam & supports are inspected by an engineer. I obtained the property information form completed by the pervious owner (a builder) who stated that no building work had been carried out. Although our surveyor pointed out that the breast had been removed he made no further comment. My solicitor was sent a copy of the survey and also raised no issues. Do I have a claim against the previous owner and solicitor to cover the cost of inspection/any remedial work.

Reply to: No building reg approval for removal of chimney breast

Submitted 5 years ago

Hi, thanks for your enquiry in connection with a regularisation made for unauthorised building work. The local authority are unable to issue a completion certificate without being able to determine that the works in question met the requirements in place at the time of the work. If this necessitates exposure to determine adequacy then damage will be unavoidable but can hopefully be minimised. Your local building control team will be able to advise you further on what will be required.

In respect of any liabilities, unfortunately you'll need to seek separate legal advice on the house sale and work carried out without seeking building regulation approval that would normally have been addressed prior to the property sale.

Regards,

David, LABC

(No subject)

Submitted 5 years ago

Thanks for your helpful reply David, I have contacted the previous owner who states that the beam was inserted prior to his ownership in 2011. Further investigation by myself shows that the beam is surrounded by some pretty ancient looking pipework and electrics, which is making my wonder whether it may have been put in prior to building reg introduction in 1985 (the house in 200 years old). Is there any way of finding out when the work was done, other than trying to chase previous owners (who may or may not still be alive), and what is to stop me simply telling everyone that it is my belief this work was carried out prior to 1985 (if there is no evidence to the contrary).

Add new comment

This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Sign up to the building bulletin newsletter

Over 48,000 construction professionals have already signed up for the LABC Building Bulletin.



Join them and receive useful tips, practical technical information and industry news by email once every 6 weeks.



Subscribe to the Building Bulletin