No building regulations approval? What's the solution?

Blog Post
No building regulations approval - picture of dog

When a property is up for sale and building work has been carried out on it, the seller will need a form of certification to say that the works have been inspected and that they comply with the building regulations.

At least, that seems to be the current view of many engaged in the conveyancing of properties.

Is building regulations approval really needed?

There are a number of snags with this:

  • Some works don’t need building regulations approval
  • Some could have been done before the regulations changed to include them
  • Others may have been carried out prior to the early 90s, before Certificates of Completion were introduced

Therefore, some works might not have needed approval, some did need approval but have no certificate and, in the worst case, they did need approval but no-one has applied for it!

In all these cases, there will be no documentation to show that the project is compliant with the building regulations.

Routes to building regulations approval

From the 11th November 1985 onwards, there have been two routes to gaining building regulations approval for building work. 

1. Through the local authority.

2. Through a private company, approved by the Secretary of State to carry out such work and issue approvals. Such companies are known as “Approved Inspectors”.

There are differences in the documentation issued, dependent on which route you take.

The key documents are those that are issued to state that the building works have been approved, inspected and passed. Where the work has been undertaken with the council's approval, the document is a “Building Regulations Certificate of Completion” and if an Approved Inspector is used, the document is a “Building Regulations Final Certificate”.

What happens if there is no approval, when there should be?

If building regulations approval and certification should have been obtained for building works and no such approval exists, there are potential consequences. Under the provisions of Section 36(6), Building Act 1984, the council can seek a High Court injunction to require the alteration or removal of work that doesn't comply.

Such an action can be expensive for a buyer. To add to the expense, the costs of either remedying the building or removing the offending work can be high.

Therefore, some have considered it wise to purchase indemnity insurance to cover such costs, should they arise.

The purchase of an insurance indemnity policy may cover the issue for one sale, but it doesn't remove the problem with the property.

What about the next time the property is sold?

The same situation exists, the same delays may occur, the same threat of action by the local authority remains, no progress has been made, the vicious circle continues.

Is this in the best interests of the home owner?

The way forward? Regularisation.

The clear way to break the vicious circle is to obtain regularisation certificate - this is the process by which a retrospective building regulations application can be made.

There are, however, some drawbacks with this:

1. The regularisation process cannot be used for work that was carried out prior to the 11th November 1985.

2. The process is a double-edged sword as what might have been thought to have been a simple lack of paperwork may turn out to be much more complex and expensive to rectify. When the remedial work is not undertaken, a Certificate of Regularisation will not be issued.

Some other issues to take into consideration are that building regulations regularisation can only be obtained from the relevant local authority as private sector Approved Inspectors aren't authorised to undertake this work. Further, the council will charge for the service they provide, and the charge will be higher than the one they would have raised at the time the application should have been made. (This is done deliberately as an incentive to applicants to make submissions in a timely manner.)

Nevertheless, only by making a regularisation application can the applicant find out definitively what is non-compliant with their building works.

How does this affect the sale of your property?

Knowing that approval can be given retrospectively might be enough for a buyer to take on the property. Then again it might not.

Whichever, it will be the owner’s responsibility to undertake the works to achieve building regulations compliance and it's important to know that this can be made a requirement before your sale can go through.

Completion certificates for work done before 2013

Update 20 November 2020. We've had many queries on work done years previously as you can see from the comments below. Here's some further information for those in that position:

Prior to 2013 there was no requirement for local authorities to issue completion certificates in all cases. Some authorities adopted a procedure to issue completions before this date, but not all, and the earlier the date the less likely it is that completion certificates would be available.  Consequently it may not be possible to provide a completion certificate for work carried out  before 2013.  Although there are provisions within the regulations for a local authority to accept applications to regularise work carried out without approval, there is no obligation on a local authority to accept such application. Also  the greater the length of time since work was completed, the less likely this would provide a satisfactory solution.

Conveyancing solicitors have increasingly demanded completion certificates, which was part of the reason for their introduction into regulation in 2013, unfortunately their demands do not take account when building work was completed. Provision of some form of indemnity policy is often promoted as an alternative, however this is usually only to cover legal action by the local authority for contravention of building regulations. A surveyors report indicating the current status of the property in relation to building regulations applicable at the time the work was carried out may be more beneficial to future occupiers.

Homeowner?

Read more on Front Door

 

More on this topic

Further information on home improvements can be found on LABC's Front Door website.

Every care was taken to ensure the information was correct at the time of publication. Any written guidance provided does not replace the user’s professional judgement. It is the responsibility of the dutyholder or person carrying out the work to ensure compliance with relevant building regulations or applicable technical standards.


This article was updated on 21 March 2022

Comments

(No subject)

Submitted 3 years 1 month ago

Hi,

For works that have been undertaken without a valid submission for Building Regulations, you may approach the Local Authority to make an application for retrospective works, known as ‘regularisation’. If you would like to apply for a Regularisation Certificate, please contact the Building Control team at your Local Authority to discuss. You can find the contact details of the relevant Building Control team by entering your postcode in the search box at the top right-hand side of our website.

Best,
LABC team

Building regs / PCC

Submitted 3 years 1 month ago

Hello,

We have recently had an offer accepted and are well in to the process of purchasing a house that was recently (2015) converted from a pub. Our solicitor has asked for a Building Regs certificate or a PCC at the minimum but the vendors haven't been able to supply this - this means that Natwest have refused to lend on the property.

The vendor has responded and said that the original Architects certificate would only last for 6 years anyway and would expire next month and therefore be redundant. Please could anyone clarify is this is worth pursuing? Should we look at another lender for the mortgage? Would we potentially have issues down the line when we came to resell?

Thanks!

LABC response

Submitted 3 years 1 month ago

Thank you for your recent inquiry regarding uncertified building works carried out to a property you are considering purchasing.
The architect’s practical completion certificate (PCC) is different from the completion certificate issued when the work is found to be satisfactory for building regulation purposes.

LABC is a membership organisation, providing advice and support to its member local authorities around England and Wales. As a result, LABC cannot comment on the application and enforcement of the Building Regulations on individual cases, as this is a matter for your local council – being the enforcing authority for building regulations. We are also unable to help you specifically with your decision on whether to proceed with the purchase, but you are correct that you may have issues down the line when you try to resell. We would, however, refer you to the general advice that we give on our website here: https://labcfrontdoor.co.uk/blog/why-you-need-a-completion-certificate-ask-anna-question-of-the-week

I hope this is of some assistance.

Best,
LABC team

25 year old conservatory

Submitted 3 years 1 month ago

We live in a conservation area and had planning permission to build a conservatory 25 years ago but was not aware of any building regs certificate at the time. Have been asked for FENSA on selling but this was pre FENSA. Does building regs still apply and should I get indemnity insurance which appears a bit ridiculous after this period of time. 2 surveyors have not commentated on this issue

(No subject)

Submitted 3 years 1 month ago

Thank you for your comment. There are a few questions to consider:

1. The construction of a conservatory may be exempt from Building Regulations as it may not be considered as habitable. The Building Regulations are in place to ensure any Building work you carry out is built to acceptable standards. To establish if the conservatory is exempt or not we would refer you to the following part of our website.
2. As you point out the FENSA scheme would not have been in place at the time you mention. Albeit FENSA only applies to replacement windows and doors rather than conservatories.
3. If the work in fact is not a conservatory but a glazed extension,(please refer to the website guide above) and it was therefore considered habitable then you can make a regularization application to your LABC team. Please note that is a decision for your LA because LABC is a member organisation and it remains the LA responsibility to enforce the Building Regulations.
4. Whilst we are aware of indemnity policies, we are not able to endorse these, you should seek advice from your LA and or solicitor.

Best,
LABC team

Final Certificate

Submitted 3 years 1 month ago

If an AI issues a final certificate and much later it is found that not all the Approved Docs compliant work was completed at all will subsequent work require a new building regs application via an AI or LABC?

LABC response

Submitted 3 years 1 month ago

Thank you for your enquiry.

LABC cannot comment on the application and enforcement of the Building Regulations on individual cases, as this is a matter for your local council – being the enforcing authority for building regulations. The answer to your question will also be dependent on the detailed circumstances of your situation.

Please contact your local authority building control team to discuss the specific nature of your concern and they will be more than happy to help. You can find their contact details by using the postcode search in the top righthand corner of this page.

Best,
LABC team

Building control and required certificate

Submitted 2 years 11 months ago

In October 2020 I was granted to change a 4 bedroom house into 2 separate self contained flats, I understand that from that date I need 3 years to complete the work and get a completion certificate from the council, I have now completed all my work on the upper flat. The neighbour downstairs has to complete the work , i.e firedoors, fire alarms, secondary glazing , he has refused to do this .
I know under these circumstances I cant sell my part of the house or tell him I want to sell the whole house through a court order.
1) Can the council or a solicitor get him to do the work ?
2) I also need 2 leases , one for myself and one for him ( the property is freehold tenants in common), can this be done even if he disagrees to do it.
3) What happens if he doesn’t agree to this and the 3 years runs out?

LABC response

Submitted 2 years 11 months ago

1) Can the council or a solicitor get him to do the work? The council has no power to make anyone carry out building work. As the work appears to have begun and – been partially completed, for your part – there is no time limit in which all the work must be completed. The 3-yrs time limit is in respect of commencing work after the deposit of plans or the giving of a Building Notice. If the work to your flat is non-compliant because of no work having been done elsewhere the council might be able to pursue enforcement, this is something you will need to discuss with your local authority building control service at the council. You might want to seek independent professional legal advice as to whether you have any legal right to make another party complete the area of building work they are responsible for.

You might also wish to ask the council if they can provide a part completion certificate for the purposes of you occupying your flat whilst the rest of the building remains incomplete. However, the council Building Control team might need to confirm that any of the features that protect your flat – fire resisting floors, fire doors on escape routes, sound insulation etc – are complete before they give any such certificate.
2) I also need 2 leases, one for myself and one for him ( the property is freehold tenants in common), can this be done even if he disagrees to do it. You should seek independent professional legal advice as to leasehold contracts. This is not something LABC or the local authority building control service at the council can assist you with.

3) What happens if he doesn’t agree to this and the 3 years runs out? As the work for the change of use of a house into 2x flats has already begun (and been partially completed it seems), there is no time limit to complete all the work, as mentioned in point 1 above.

Best,
LABC team

Completion Certificate but no Planning Permission

Submitted 2 years 11 months ago

We're in the process of buying a property which has had 2 extensions which did not have Building Regulation Completion Certificates nor Planning Permission. We've now received Building Regulation Completion Certificates and some Indemnity Policies for some older work, e.g. doors without FENSA certificates. However, we still don't have anything around Planning Permission. I assume that the Completion Certificate doesn't give us retrospective Planning Permission? If not, the extensions were erected over 4 years ago so I understand they're not really actionable - but would having the Completion Certificates being dated 2021 affect that - and in either case, might it be a good idea to request Planning Permission Indemnity Insurance?..

Add new comment

This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Sign up to the building bulletin newsletter

Over 48,000 construction professionals have already signed up for the LABC Building Bulletin.



Join them and receive useful tips, practical technical information and industry news by email once every 6 weeks.



Subscribe to the Building Bulletin