No building regulations approval? What's the solution?
When a property is up for sale and building work has been carried out on it, the seller will need a form of certification to say that the works have been inspected and that they comply with the building regulations.
At least, that seems to be the current view of many engaged in the conveyancing of properties.
Is building regulations approval really needed?
There are a number of snags with this:
- Some works don’t need building regulations approval
- Some could have been done before the regulations changed to include them
- Others may have been carried out prior to the early 90s, before Certificates of Completion were introduced
Therefore, some works might not have needed approval, some did need approval but have no certificate and, in the worst case, they did need approval but no-one has applied for it!
In all these cases, there will be no documentation to show that the project is compliant with the building regulations.
Routes to building regulations approval
From the 11th November 1985 onwards, there have been two routes to gaining building regulations approval for building work.
1. Through the local authority.
2. Through a private company, approved by the Secretary of State to carry out such work and issue approvals. Such companies are known as “Approved Inspectors”.
There are differences in the documentation issued, dependent on which route you take.
The key documents are those that are issued to state that the building works have been approved, inspected and passed. Where the work has been undertaken with the council's approval, the document is a “Building Regulations Certificate of Completion” and if an Approved Inspector is used, the document is a “Building Regulations Final Certificate”.
What happens if there is no approval, when there should be?
If building regulations approval and certification should have been obtained for building works and no such approval exists, there are potential consequences. Under the provisions of Section 36(6), Building Act 1984, the council can seek a High Court injunction to require the alteration or removal of work that doesn't comply.
Such an action can be expensive for a buyer. To add to the expense, the costs of either remedying the building or removing the offending work can be high.
Therefore, some have considered it wise to purchase indemnity insurance to cover such costs, should they arise.
The purchase of an insurance indemnity policy may cover the issue for one sale, but it doesn't remove the problem with the property.
What about the next time the property is sold?
The same situation exists, the same delays may occur, the same threat of action by the local authority remains, no progress has been made, the vicious circle continues.
Is this in the best interests of the home owner?
The way forward? Regularisation.
The clear way to break the vicious circle is to obtain regularisation certificate - this is the process by which a retrospective building regulations application can be made.
There are, however, some drawbacks with this:
1. The regularisation process cannot be used for work that was carried out prior to the 11th November 1985.
2. The process is a double-edged sword as what might have been thought to have been a simple lack of paperwork may turn out to be much more complex and expensive to rectify. When the remedial work is not undertaken, a Certificate of Regularisation will not be issued.
Some other issues to take into consideration are that building regulations regularisation can only be obtained from the relevant local authority as private sector Approved Inspectors aren't authorised to undertake this work. Further, the council will charge for the service they provide, and the charge will be higher than the one they would have raised at the time the application should have been made. (This is done deliberately as an incentive to applicants to make submissions in a timely manner.)
Nevertheless, only by making a regularisation application can the applicant find out definitively what is non-compliant with their building works.
How does this affect the sale of your property?
Knowing that approval can be given retrospectively might be enough for a buyer to take on the property. Then again it might not.
Whichever, it will be the owner’s responsibility to undertake the works to achieve building regulations compliance and it's important to know that this can be made a requirement before your sale can go through.
Completion certificates for work done before 2013
Update 20 November 2020. We've had many queries on work done years previously as you can see from the comments below. Here's some further information for those in that position:
Prior to 2013 there was no requirement for local authorities to issue completion certificates in all cases. Some authorities adopted a procedure to issue completions before this date, but not all, and the earlier the date the less likely it is that completion certificates would be available. Consequently it may not be possible to provide a completion certificate for work carried out before 2013. Although there are provisions within the regulations for a local authority to accept applications to regularise work carried out without approval, there is no obligation on a local authority to accept such application. Also the greater the length of time since work was completed, the less likely this would provide a satisfactory solution.
Conveyancing solicitors have increasingly demanded completion certificates, which was part of the reason for their introduction into regulation in 2013, unfortunately their demands do not take account when building work was completed. Provision of some form of indemnity policy is often promoted as an alternative, however this is usually only to cover legal action by the local authority for contravention of building regulations. A surveyors report indicating the current status of the property in relation to building regulations applicable at the time the work was carried out may be more beneficial to future occupiers.
Homeowner?
Further information on home improvements can be found on LABC's Front Door website.
- Where can I get a copy of my building certificate?
- The importance of completion certificates for building work
- Homeowners' frequently asked questions
Every care was taken to ensure the information was correct at the time of publication. Any written guidance provided does not replace the user’s professional judgement. It is the responsibility of the dutyholder or person carrying out the work to ensure compliance with relevant building regulations or applicable technical standards.
This article was updated on 21 March 2022
Sign up to the building bulletin newsletter
Over 48,000 construction professionals have already signed up for the LABC Building Bulletin.
Join them and receive useful tips, practical technical information and industry news by email once every 6 weeks.
Subscribe to the Building Bulletin
Comments
Bathroom in Attic extra velux
Submitted 4 years ago
When we rewired and plumbed the house we partioned one end , added an ensuite (toilet, showers, sink, electric heater, small velux)
The water and waste are routed to the rear soil pipe.
In the main room we added 3 velux (alongside the original)
We did not obtain any building control certificates and now at the end of sale of out house and have been asked by our buyers solicitor for them.
We bought an indemnity on our last house where we had converted a loft space.
Would this be the way to go this time due to not wanting to hold up.the sale (or lose it)
Reply
Submitted 4 years ago
It is our understanding that the provision of an indemnity certificate for the works typically only covers against any future enforcement action taken by the local authority and the indemnity may indeed be invalid if there are known unauthorised works prior to taking out the cover, as is the case in this instance, so you are advised to check exactly what the indemnity insurance will cover. There are time limits the local authority have to work to in respect of formal enforcement action, and it may well be that these time limits have already lapsed (that would be the case if the works are over two years old), so there would be no real benefit to have the indemnity cover.
In some instances, purchasers will proceed (when there are unauthorised works) providing the sale price is adjusted (subject to negotiation) to reflect the risks they will be taking on.
The only way to prevent the issue of the unauthorised works being brought up on this and future house sales would be to apply for a regularisation certificate from your local authority, which is considered best advice in this instance. If you were to apply for a regularisation certificate, it is likely that certain elements of the works would require exposing, in order for the local authority to ascertain compliance with the regulations at the time the works were undertaken. Once the local authority were satisfied with the works, a regularisation certificate would be issued. You could contact your local authority building control team to discuss the application process and they may well be able to provide some pre-application advice.
I trust you find this response helpful.
Kind regards
Richard, LABC
Ground floor chimney removed
Submitted 4 years ago
Lack of certificate for new build
Submitted 4 years ago
I don’t have a building control certificate. Am I right to think in these circumstances there must have been one?
(No subject)
Submitted 4 years ago
Thank you for getting in touch with LABC.
The issuing of a warranty certificate is not predicated on having a completion certificate. You are advised therefore to check with Premier, to see, if on this occasion they undertook the building control function as well as inspecting for the purposes of warranty cover. If Premier did not undertake the building control function, you should contact your local authority building control section and make the relevant enquiries - they may well have inspected this development, or it could have been controlled by an Approved Inspector.
I trust you find this response of some use.
Kind regards
Richard, LABC
Building certificate needed for mortgage
Submitted 4 years ago
Reply
Submitted 4 years ago
Prior to 2013, there was no requirement for local authorities to issue completion certificates in all cases. Some authorities adopted a procedure to issue completions before this date, but not all, and the earlier the date the less likely it is that completion certificates would be available. Consequently it may not be possible to provide a completion certificate for work carried out before 2013. Although there are provisions within the regulations for a local authority to accept applications to regularise work carried out without approval, there is no obligation on a local authority to accept such application. Also the greater the length of time since work was completed, the less likely this would provide a satisfactory solution.
Conveyancing solicitors have increasingly demanded completion certificates which was part of the reason for their introduction into regulation in 2013, unfortunately their demands do not take account of when building work was completed. Provision of some form of indemnity policy is often promoted as an alternative, however this is usually only to cover legal action by the local authority for contravention of building regulations. A surveyors report indicating the current status of the property in relation to building regulations applicable at the time the work was carried out may be more beneficial to future occupiers.
Kind regards
Barry, LABC
Loft "conversion" and removal of walls, no building certificates
Submitted 4 years ago
Great Post and comments, thank you. I'm a first time buyer, thought everything was going smoothly but solicitor has raised lack of building certs for work done on the house. Our vendor has had the place for four years and the works pre-date her but not know how old they are and I would suspect loft at least was post 1986.
The loft was not marketed as a habitable space although it was laid out with a desk in it so clear it has been used as an office, which we would also like to do
I think from reading this and the comments that there are four potential issues:
- if I buy it could I be forced to do the work to bring it up to standard by LA - am assuming not as it is at least four years old?
- lender issues (although they should gave valued it without the loft space as I didn't say it was a bedroom)
- safety (although I had a full survey done and this didn't reveal issues)
- future saleability.
The last three make me think I should insist on seller getting retrospective approval but are there any valid reasons for them refusing to do this? I don't want to hold everything up but I feel this is something they should have thought about when selling the property. In fact I'm surprised Estate Agents / sellers shouldn't have to disclose this sort of thing when selling.
Thanks
Rear Extension Without any paperwork
Submitted 4 years ago
We bought house 2 years back which has 2.5Meter rear extension and it is a very old extension(80's), and later we come to know it does not fully comply with the building regulation. When we asked for paperwork in the purchase process, the seller offers indemnity insurance, and my solicitor said that after 3 years any construction becomes immune and LA cannot take action. With this little information and based on the assumption that no planning permission required for less than 3Meter extention, we proceed, now I am planning to refurbish the extension from inside. Will it be treated as new development?
1960's conversion
Submitted 4 years ago
Add new comment